3 ms·
I'd argue that's an assumption. To your second point, he never retracted his original statement because he never said woman shouldn't vote. What statement woul
by randyrand 9y ago
I'd argue that's an assumption.
To your second point, he never retracted his original statement because he never said woman shouldn't vote. What statement would you like him to retract? For your sake he still clarified his beliefs "I don’t think any class of people should be disenfranchised".
- gizmo 9y agoYou edited your post to remove the first sentence of Thiel's response: "It would be absurd to suggest that women’s votes will be taken away". That's a deflection, because it's a truism and doesn't address the criticism. Of course women's right to vote won't be taken away, but Thiel still believes that women's voting rights are not compatible with a free (meaning libertarian) society.
- randyrand 9y agoI deleted it for that reason. Its a truism and does not represent his belief. Your last sentence may be a truism as well. It's a belief about the way things are, not the way things should be.