4 ms·
When I was in grad school the college gave people newspapers to read. So for a few years I read USA Today and the NY Times regularly. There is no way I would ev
by jccalhoun 9y ago
When I was in grad school the college gave people newspapers to read. So for a few years I read USA Today and the NY Times regularly. There is no way I would ever pay for a newspaper subscription.
Most times there was nothing in them I cared about or hadn't heard about. Why should I pay for a sports section when I don't care about sports? Why should I pay for an arts section in the NY Times that is all about plays and events that are only playing in New York which is several hundred miles away?
- dredmorbius 9y agoBundling is a form of risk management in which a publisher bets that the collective value of a bundle will be of greater interest to a large population than any disaggregated set. There are problems when certain portions of that bundle dominate the product, and are not what you care for (sport being a disinterest you and I share). Worse if sport intrudes other sections of the production -- I'm familiar with a print source in which it may be found on the front page, multiple times within the front section, periodically on the Op Ed pages (though those are otherwise almost wholly lacking in interest or information already), business, real estate, entertainment, .... I'd be happy if it were simply restricted to one section which I could then discard with no regrets. Your criticism of the Times's culture coverage is one I share. I've strongly suggested that at the least a regional substitute be offered such that local offerings elsewhere within the US -- say, Boston, Washington, Atlanta, Miami, Chicago, Denver, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Seattle -- be offered print subscribers in those areas. The Times is close to being a reasonable alternative to any local publication, though this also poses concerns....