3 ms·
Yeah that's true. For better or worse, designers try to make their mark by coming up with very distinctive designs that all too often throw affordance and usabi
by cageface 9y ago
Yeah that's true. For better or worse, designers try to make their mark by coming up with very distinctive designs that all too often throw affordance and usability out the window. Mobile UX is in a pretty bad place overall right now. Watching my parents struggle to do basic things on an iPad has been a good reality check for me in this regard.
- bsimpson 9y agoOne of the legacies of the successes of Flash and the web is that brands are pushing for an aesthetic that feels like their own. On the desktop, most Mac apps looked like most other Mac apps. On the web, authors often created their own components, and could completely customize their look. Mobile has largely tacked towards the web, where Airbnb looks more like Airbnb than it does like any other Android or iOS app.
- MaxBarraclough 9y agoDesktop isn't all that consistent. Spotify uses its own skin, as does Windows iTunes. NetBeans uses Swing with the Nimbus look-and-feel. Firefox and Chrome use their own toolkits (e.g. on their Settings windows). Even Microsoft Word feels like 'its own thing'. UWP applications don't tend to feel native. At least RoboMongo and the CMake GUI feel like proper Windows applications, but they both use Qt.