4 ms·
The data mostly looks like population data then, if US, India, and China are the leaders. What would it look like for ton-mile per capita (if that's actually a
by kingbirdy 9y ago
The data mostly looks like population data then, if US, India, and China are the leaders. What would it look like for ton-mile per capita (if that's actually a statistic)?
- masklinn 9y ago> The data mostly looks like population data then The US has a smaller population than the EU (~300m to ~500m). So does Russia (150m). Australia has a significantly smaller population than the EU (15^H^H25m as golemiprague noted). It's not population data it's mineral commodities. > What would it look like for ton-mile per capita (if that's actually a statistic)? The US would climb to ~15x the tonnes-kilometers per capita of the EU, and australia would shoot up to about the same ratio over the EU (owing to close tonne-kilometer but 1/20th the population). Russia would shoot up as well. Only China and India would get a lower rank overall, and not enough that the EU would come close to edging them for China at least (a bit under 3x the population, but a bit under 10x the tonner-kilometer of rail freight).
- txsh 9y agoEurope’s population is ~750m.
- golemiprague 9y agoAustralia has close to 25m
- masklinn 9y agoIndeed typo'd in the first paragraph. Fixed. Note the ratio is correct in the second one.