> They’re just specifying the country, not including it in the list. Yeah, no, not quite. Only one city got that treatment, so it's not an invalid interpretati

> They’re just specifying the country, not including it in the list. Yeah, no, not quite. Only one city got that treatment, so it's not an invalid interpretation. The alternative to the journalist who cannot read a map is that the journalist should learn how to write, but either way it's an error of WSJ.