2 ms·
No, on two counts. Firstly, we begin with a power imbalance, we're not on a level playing field. Secondly, there's nothing inconsistent about both parties bei
by wyattpeak 9y ago
No, on two counts.
Firstly, we begin with a power imbalance, we're not on a level playing field.
Secondly, there's nothing inconsistent about both parties being able to create an unwinnable state for the other. As I stated earlier in my comment, the most likely outcome is no dealing whatsoever. The only rational alternative is an agreement whose effects we can both perfectly foresee.