> and then using "type" again to refer to generic type parameter T I was curious enough to grab a nearby textbook on Java. The author very clearly calls these

> and then using "type" again to refer to generic type parameter T I was curious enough to grab a nearby textbook on Java. The author very clearly calls these things "type parameters" or "type variables". Imagine trying to write the whole chapter just calling them "types"..... "Your generic type will have two other types T and E and we will fill in Grape as type T and Fred as type E...." It'd be a disaster! Instead he's used clear language, every single time he refers to one of those things, he uses the specific term. Much better experience.