16 ms·

I highly recommend using Gitosis; it makes managing teams, projects and users a breeze. It's really nifty: you get a git repo that contains the ssh keys and con

by rafd 16y ago

I highly recommend using Gitosis; it makes managing teams, projects and users a breeze. It's really nifty: you get a git repo that contains the ssh keys and config file to manage the system. Add the user's key, add the user to the config file, push, and you're done!

cdr 16y ago
I don't see any reason to run gitosis when there's gitolite, even for a single user. Either is definitely preferable to doing things manually, though.
- ehsanul 16y ago
  I just went throught gitolite's readme, and I don't see any reason why a lone dev might want to use it, since it seems to be built for managing teams with access control needs. Doing it manually for me just means (on the server): mkdir project_name cd project_name git init --bare Hardy difficult. I already have ssh keys set up from long back, so that's all I have to do really. Then I just add the remote repository on my local machine.
  - cdr 16y ago
    I avoid sysadmin work when possible - it's not something I enjoy spending time on. Setting up gitolite is dead simple - setting up a git server manually manually might be 'simple' compared to other tasks, but it's still unnecessary work. Creating new repos is as simple as changing the config file and pushing it - no need to do anything on the server at all. I see absolutely no reason TO do it manually, and that's the decider.
nuclear_eclipse 16y ago
As mentioned by cdr, "Gitolite" is a spiritual successor to gitosis, and has a lot improvements and new features in management, permissions, and setup.
patio11 16y ago
Installing gitosis was probably the most error-prone and miserable experience I have ever had in Ubuntu system administration. Solid as a rock once I got it up, but man, at the time I had to cobble three different blog posts together with a bit of bubblegum. Obligatory disclaimer: my mental model for both git and sysadminning is not as good as the mean HN reader's.

by rafd 16y ago

cdr 16y ago

I don't see any reason to run gitosis when there's gitolite, even for a single user. Either is definitely preferable to doing things manually, though.

ehsanul 16y ago
I just went throught gitolite's readme, and I don't see any reason why a lone dev might want to use it, since it seems to be built for managing teams with access control needs. Doing it manually for me just means (on the server): mkdir project_name cd project_name git init --bare Hardy difficult. I already have ssh keys set up from long back, so that's all I have to do really. Then I just add the remote repository on my local machine.
- cdr 16y ago
  I avoid sysadmin work when possible - it's not something I enjoy spending time on. Setting up gitolite is dead simple - setting up a git server manually manually might be 'simple' compared to other tasks, but it's still unnecessary work. Creating new repos is as simple as changing the config file and pushing it - no need to do anything on the server at all. I see absolutely no reason TO do it manually, and that's the decider.

nuclear_eclipse 16y ago

As mentioned by cdr, "Gitolite" is a spiritual successor to gitosis, and has a lot improvements and new features in management, permissions, and setup.

patio11 16y ago

Installing gitosis was probably the most error-prone and miserable experience I have ever had in Ubuntu system administration. Solid as a rock once I got it up, but man, at the time I had to cobble three different blog posts together with a bit of bubblegum. Obligatory disclaimer: my mental model for both git and sysadminning is not as good as the mean HN reader's.