8 ms·

still worth it

EggsOnToast 9y ago
This was my feeling too. I don't want to live in a world where everyone is expected to freely give away their data, but if I can do it voluntarily to get get a deal as good as MoviePass then that's a win/win to me. It's $15 for just -one- ticket in my area. MoviePass has been a game changer for me.
- craftyguy 9y ago
  > but if I can do it voluntarily The catch here is that no customers of theirs were given a chance to do so voluntarily. They purposefully misled customers so even though it's nice you don't care, others who do fell into the trap. That's fucked up.
  - EggsOnToast 9y ago
    Do you have a link on that or are you talking about the current article? I believe you but I wasn't one of the early adopters of MoviePass so by the time I joined I skimmed the contract, nodded, and thought "Got it, you spy on me and I get cheap stuff."
    - throwaway2048 9y ago
      some vaugely worded crap that would take a lawyer to figure out buried in a 40 page TOS isn't informed consent, sorry.
      - EggsOnToast 9y ago
        I'm not sure why your tone is so hostile when I was just asking a clarifying question. More to your point, I don't see what part of the ToS you found especially convoluted, but since your estimate about the length is so exaggerated I doubt you actually read it. The wording was boring but clear and its formatting wasn't particularly mysterious either. If your point is more generally that we shouldn't be able to just skim a ToS and give consent, what's your alternative that doesn't destroy the ability of online businesses to engage in these kinds of agreements? Edit: I'm adding this here because I can't reply to the comment below me by s73v3r_ 26. You in particular might not care, but there are a lot of people who feel like these businesses provide valuable services and don't mind being expected to actually be accountable for the things they agree to. If you don't like ToS businesses online, come up with an alternative. Otherwise, unless your plan is just to go on a tirade, you need to at least try to consider an alternative to outright destruction or your argument is going to lose all of its persuasive power when talking to people who do value these services.
        s73v3r_ 9y ago
        "what's your alternative that doesn't destroy the ability of online businesses to engage in these kinds of agreements?" Why should we care about preserving one of the worst business practices of recent times?
        salvar 9y ago
        Maybe not everyone shares your view that this is "one of the worst business practices of recent times"?
        throwaway2048 9y ago
        https://i.imgur.com/uPnlHlq.png https://i.imgur.com/uPnlHlq.png Ok, its 11 pages, which according to http://niram.org/read/ http://niram.org/read/ should take 32 minutes to read, can be updated at any time, and contains such language as You agree to indemnify and hold MoviePass, its officers, directors, shareholders, predecessors, successors in interest, employees, agents, subsidiaries and affiliates, harmless from any demands, loss, liability, claims or expenses (including attorneys' fees), made against MoviePass by any third party due to or arising out of or in connection with your use of the MoviePass Service or Site. and MoviePass's obligations, if any, with regard to its products and services are governed solely by the agreements pursuant to which they are provided, and nothing on this Site should be construed to alter such agreements. These kind of terms could have very unexpected consequences, and you need real legal expertise to decipher exactly what that means.
        EggsOnToast 9y ago
        The only two words that are beyond what's taught in highschool in those quoted passages are "indemnify" and "pursuant" neither of which is actually too complex to understand from a cursory google search. The sentence structure is straightforward and it's grammatically clear that the parties listed are all part of the clause pertaining to who you agree to indemnify. The bulk of your argument is that it's unfair to expect people to have a basic level of reading comprehension for a transaction that's entirely voluntary on their part. I don't see the great crime against humanity you're trying to establish here.
- jwe23oi38 9y ago
  I don't generate much sympathy over folks having a hard time with access to first world luxuries. The resources being used up to power MoviePass, so people can have deals on a novelty experience that they need to keep getting a hit from or they'll.... oh right it's just movies. almost entirely cliche and repetitive after 60 years of figuring out the medium. "Game changer". Wow your life sounds rough.

still worth it

This was my feeling too. I don't want to live in a world where everyone is expected to freely give away their data, but if I can do it voluntarily to get get a deal as good as MoviePass then that's a win/win to me. It's $15 for just -one- ticket in my area. MoviePass has been a game changer for me.

craftyguy 9y ago
> but if I can do it voluntarily The catch here is that no customers of theirs were given a chance to do so voluntarily. They purposefully misled customers so even though it's nice you don't care, others who do fell into the trap. That's fucked up.
- EggsOnToast 9y ago
  Do you have a link on that or are you talking about the current article? I believe you but I wasn't one of the early adopters of MoviePass so by the time I joined I skimmed the contract, nodded, and thought "Got it, you spy on me and I get cheap stuff."
  - throwaway2048 9y ago
    some vaugely worded crap that would take a lawyer to figure out buried in a 40 page TOS isn't informed consent, sorry.
    - EggsOnToast 9y ago
      I'm not sure why your tone is so hostile when I was just asking a clarifying question. More to your point, I don't see what part of the ToS you found especially convoluted, but since your estimate about the length is so exaggerated I doubt you actually read it. The wording was boring but clear and its formatting wasn't particularly mysterious either. If your point is more generally that we shouldn't be able to just skim a ToS and give consent, what's your alternative that doesn't destroy the ability of online businesses to engage in these kinds of agreements? Edit: I'm adding this here because I can't reply to the comment below me by s73v3r_ 26. You in particular might not care, but there are a lot of people who feel like these businesses provide valuable services and don't mind being expected to actually be accountable for the things they agree to. If you don't like ToS businesses online, come up with an alternative. Otherwise, unless your plan is just to go on a tirade, you need to at least try to consider an alternative to outright destruction or your argument is going to lose all of its persuasive power when talking to people who do value these services.
      - s73v3r_ 9y ago
        "what's your alternative that doesn't destroy the ability of online businesses to engage in these kinds of agreements?" Why should we care about preserving one of the worst business practices of recent times?
        salvar 9y ago
        Maybe not everyone shares your view that this is "one of the worst business practices of recent times"?
      - throwaway2048 9y ago
        https://i.imgur.com/uPnlHlq.png https://i.imgur.com/uPnlHlq.png Ok, its 11 pages, which according to http://niram.org/read/ http://niram.org/read/ should take 32 minutes to read, can be updated at any time, and contains such language as You agree to indemnify and hold MoviePass, its officers, directors, shareholders, predecessors, successors in interest, employees, agents, subsidiaries and affiliates, harmless from any demands, loss, liability, claims or expenses (including attorneys' fees), made against MoviePass by any third party due to or arising out of or in connection with your use of the MoviePass Service or Site. and MoviePass's obligations, if any, with regard to its products and services are governed solely by the agreements pursuant to which they are provided, and nothing on this Site should be construed to alter such agreements. These kind of terms could have very unexpected consequences, and you need real legal expertise to decipher exactly what that means.
        EggsOnToast 9y ago
        The only two words that are beyond what's taught in highschool in those quoted passages are "indemnify" and "pursuant" neither of which is actually too complex to understand from a cursory google search. The sentence structure is straightforward and it's grammatically clear that the parties listed are all part of the clause pertaining to who you agree to indemnify. The bulk of your argument is that it's unfair to expect people to have a basic level of reading comprehension for a transaction that's entirely voluntary on their part. I don't see the great crime against humanity you're trying to establish here.
jwe23oi38 9y ago
I don't generate much sympathy over folks having a hard time with access to first world luxuries. The resources being used up to power MoviePass, so people can have deals on a novelty experience that they need to keep getting a hit from or they'll.... oh right it's just movies. almost entirely cliche and repetitive after 60 years of figuring out the medium. "Game changer". Wow your life sounds rough.