3 ms·
Have seen a couple interesting articles[0][1] highlighting the weirdness of building Chromium on Windows, so hopefully this LLVM improvement will be a step towa
by equalunique 9y ago
Have seen a couple interesting articles[0][1] highlighting the weirdness of building Chromium on Windows, so hopefully this LLVM improvement will be a step towards a smoother process.
[0] https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/compiler-bug-linker-bug-windows-kernel-bug/ https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/compiler-bug-li...
[1] https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/24-core-cpu-and-i-cant-move-my-mouse/ https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/24-core-cpu-and...
- jwilk 9y agoOn HN: [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16463572 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16463572 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14733829 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14733829
- brucedawson 9y agoHey, those are mine! Those two issues (and this one: https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/11/zombie-processes-are-eating-your-memory/ https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/11/zombie-processe...) are equally problematic with clang. Two of them were problems with Windows, and one was a flaw in a Microsoft system management component. Luckily they are all mitigated, fixed, or being fixed, so my Chrome builds run much more smoothly now.
- equalunique 9y agoThank you for chiming in! Your articles are wonderful!
- zamalek 9y agoDid you guys ever reverse-spec the name mangling?
- katastic 9y agoDid Microsoft ever fix their kernel bug with process creation you wrote about?