3 ms·
>medium, context, or means of interaction The first analog that is at all comparable is hypertext and the web interface to the internet. This is much the same
by 52-6F-62 9y ago
>medium, context, or means of interaction
The first analog that is at all comparable is hypertext and the web interface to the internet. This is much the same except it's harder to clean up.
Who decides what is illicit? Like I said, I'm not trying to start a semantics discussion. I'm not talking about morally debatable subjects. There are some blatantly disgusting things out there that have ruinous effects on people who've made no decision to take part. A platform like IPFS allows that to gain a new root, and deeper this time.
Hence my posed question.
- jake_the_third 9y agoWhen it comes to imposing your views on others, everything becomes a matter of morals; What you and I may find irredeemable is acceptable to others. There are many activities we engage in that have ruinous effects on others that are accepted as necessary or even celebrated by society, so negative effect on others isn't a meaningful criterium for moderation. Without determining who decides what is illicit and what isn't, talking about moderation is meaningless. My expectation that moderation will be done by law enforcement, as is the case with other protocols like bittorrent.