What a load of speculative, thin twaddle. This is just an extension of the never-ending “hard takeoff” malicious-AI argument (as exemplified by “Our Final Inven

What a load of speculative, thin twaddle. This is just an extension of the never-ending “hard takeoff” malicious-AI argument (as exemplified by “Our Final Invention” by James Barrat and others). “It might cause a mob” or “it might contain a compressed AI that ingratiates itself and betrays us” is really not a terribly convincing argument. It's just... paranoid and meek.