4 ms·
A better way would be to require all browser makers or OS makers add an easy to use child protection filter that can be easily enabled by parents. This is a se
by justonepost 9y ago
A better way would be to require all browser makers or OS makers add an easy to use child protection filter that can be easily enabled by parents.
This is a serious issue and while the OP bill is obvious censorship, all parents want more easy control.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- orangecat 9y agoA better way would be to require all browser makers or OS makers add an easy to use child protection filter that can be easily enabled by parents. That's still a bad idea, unless we want to criminalize a whole lot of existing software. Suppose I have a Python script that parses HTML from a URL and downloads all the images it finds. Would that be illegal to distribute unless I hook into the OS-level filters? For that matter, what about Python itself?
- interfixus 9y ago> * all parents want more easy control* Refuted. I am a parent. I do not want 'more easy control'.
- justonepost 9y agoReally? You don't want to be able to easily ensure that your pre-teens aren't able to easily access violent porn? Alright, I guess "all" is little hyperbolic. But I think the sentiment stands firm. I also think we need to avoid censorship as much as possible, and ensure parents have more control by default is the best path forward. Otherwise we'll end up with a solution like the UK has where age registration has to be done by everyone.
- jononor 9y agoAren't there hundreds of parental control applications available out there already?