4 ms·
The article makes the point, quite explicitly, that you should not even call a vast conspiracy a “vast conspiracy”. Not because it’s “not PC”, but simply becaus
by shaki-dora 9y ago
The article makes the point, quite explicitly, that you should not even call a vast conspiracy a “vast conspiracy”. Not because it’s “not PC”, but simply because people on the receiving end of such diatribes have come to associate certain terms with cranks.
You can disregard such advise, and simply launch more and more over-the-top screeches against the MSM trying to silence you. But you’re not going to change any minds.
- lemagedurage 9y agoWhat about using evidence instead of manipulating your point in order to convince people?
- shaki-dora 9y agoYes, it would be great to live in a world where everyone would judge everything on its merits alone, like you do. Unfortunately, we don’t. Which is why we still put on pants for interviews, write in full sentences, and occasionally waste oxygen being nicer to others than warranted by the cold hard facts alone.
- lemagedurage 9y agoWell i do like warmth, just the genuine kind, not the politeness peer-pressure kind i feel is promoted in the article. Real warmth speaks from actions (patterns) and not from words, because words are forged too easily. An evil person could sugar coat twice as much and get a better job than their honest peer, hm? (virus scanners) When you see through it you can choose to either exploit it or be fair. That's your call.