4 ms·
I don't know who you're debating. Your original comment used a reference to the weather to argue a point about climate. You can't do that, as your follow up com
by mseebach 9y ago
I don't know who you're debating. Your original comment used a reference to the weather to argue a point about climate. You can't do that, as your follow up comments clearly explain.
- libertine 9y agoI can do this: > You don't need to go to South America, Asia or middle East - it's happening in Europe and no one seems to notice. First sentence commenting an article about drought in several continents, yet they didn't mention Europe. So I stated such thing is happening in Europe. > Look at Portugal and Spain, it's becoming a desert - the day of the cold wave the south of Portugal and Spain had the same temperatures of some country's in Africa. In this sentence I state the example of Portugal and Spain - and gave an example of a day of extreme cold, snow and rain in Europe and parts of that territory (the iberian peninsula) had a day with temperatures similar to parts of Africa. Saying I can't use weather to argue about climate is the same thing as saying I can't talk about anything which is the outcome of something else. I'm not saying that because of that specific weather event in that day (or days) it set the climate for that region - I say it has a point of data. I gave you more - which is a clear example of a long term effect resulting from climate change - the drought of the main river. Do you want more data points?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]