4 ms·

I’m aware. Per the very first line of its wikipedia page: > The National Health Service (NHS) is the name used for each of the public health services in the U

• DanBC 9y ago
  But it makes no sense in the context of your comment. The Scottish NHS has nothing to do with London. But even within only the English NHS, what happens in say Bristol has nothing to do with London. My point stands: London is more diverse than anywhere in the US, and the various NHS CCGs in London are doing okay.
  • moduspol 9y ago
    > The Scottish NHS has nothing to do with London. This is just getting boring as you argue pointlessly over semantics. UK: Covered collectively by the NHS, which has its own branches. England: A part of the UK that has 55 million people and its own branch of the NHS. It is racially 85% white and 7% Asian. London: A big city in England with a population around 9 million. The number of people in London is much smaller than the number of people in all of England, and all of the UK. Yet, England (as shown above) is quite racially homogenous (typically a good indicator for being culturally homogenous). That a single city exists in a sea that is culturally homogenous (that you feel like is "doing okay") does not mean that if all of England or the UK's population were more diverse, there would be no problems. Nobody is arguing that the system would collapse the moment it encounters a single diverse area, so your point is irrelevant.