> The article claims that they're doing it to protect themselves from future lawsuits, not as "revenge": Then the article is disingenuous, because the same cop

> The article claims that they're doing it to protect themselves from future lawsuits, not as "revenge": Then the article is disingenuous, because the same copyright period and liabilities exist in most EU countries. Singling out Germany because a German company was first to sue is pure revenge. If they wanted to protect themselves, they would block the whole EU and a whole lot of countries outside the EU, not just Germany.