3 ms·
Give it a try. Many AI classes talk about the fact that metadata are less often relevant than we think and are often embedded in the image in a way the classif
by Iv 9y ago
Give it a try.
Many AI classes talk about the fact that metadata are less often relevant than we think and are often embedded in the image in a way the classifier easily learns.
In an event, the classifier will probably spot a few architectural elements that will make useless to rely on the time of the picture.
On my first attempt at image classification with deep learning I was surprised at how a very badly design and not custom-tailored network managed to outperform a classifier that had several days of work into it.
I'd say give it a try anyway, you could be surprised.
- taeric 9y agoAs I said, there are some pictures where the only thing in them are my kids. Lighting was such that they are literally all that is in the picture. And I'm talking about 3 month old pictures. They look identical. Not surprisingly, even the well trained classifiers of Google and Amazon get them wrong. None of this was to say this isn't impressive. It truly is. I don't know why my bar for the magic of image recognition is so high.