2 ms·
That is not what I am suggesting at all. My point is that google appear to be getting better-than-average protection (a whole fake bus to catch a BB-gun vandal
by jacknews 9y ago
That is not what I am suggesting at all.
My point is that google appear to be getting better-than-average protection (a whole fake bus to catch a BB-gun vandal), yet paying less-than-average (taxes) toward it, and are hardly a vulnerable member of society, where that might make sense.
- kstenerud 9y agoSo then, the suggested policy is to not offer novel solutions to catching criminals if the victim is a large corporation, unless they pay for it out of pocket?
- jacknews 9y agoMy suggested policy would be to point out the exceptional service they receive from the state, and encourage them to pay for it fairly, rather than being dicks with their various legal-but-morally-questionable tax strategies. Eg they could log sales in the country they were actually made, and pay taxes on them there - rather than paying "royalties" to a shell company in the British Virgin Islands or some other notorious tax avoidance hub.