3 ms·
four crossings instead of two, not four instead of one. unless you're simply crossing the cross street, and not actually crossing the highway, which there isn't
by notatoad 9y ago
four crossings instead of two, not four instead of one. unless you're simply crossing the cross street, and not actually crossing the highway, which there isn't really any reason a pedestrian would do at that at that intersection.
making two 36' crossings is a lot safer than a single 72' crossing. narrowing the crossing width is a good thing in intersection design, even if it takes a bit longer. It's a fairly long walk for for a pedestrian to make, waiting for an extra light isn't going to make a significant change to the crossing length for a pedestrian.