7 ms·
This is one of those areas where anecdata is misleading. http://www.firstmet.com/dating-blog/online-dating-money-factor-income-matters-when-looking-for-love/ h
by T2_t2 9y ago
This is one of those areas where anecdata is misleading.
http://www.firstmet.com/dating-blog/online-dating-money-factor-income-matters-when-looking-for-love/ http://www.firstmet.com/dating-blog/online-dating-money-fact...
And this stays true after finding someone:
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article148558804.html http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/articl...
https://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-inside-job/2008/05/20/wives-as-breadwinners-resent-husbands https://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-inside-job/2008/05/...
- elefanten 9y agoBoth the second and the third link paint a much more balanced picture than I think you imply. They both make the important point that there is no F to M wealth gap resentment in partnerships where the man takes on additional domestic responsibilities that are traditionally reserved for women. That makes intuitive sense both practically (bandwidth) and symbolically (fairness/partnership). The HBR/Herald thing goes into detail. And the US News article points out the status quo has already grown to 20% female breadwinner households. If it wasn't a successful model, it probably wouldn't be growing in share.