3 ms·
I missed that, somewhat recent, development thank you for pointing this out. Still, as you said, this is legally murky and I wouldn't be too surprised if this t
by freeflight 9y ago
I missed that, somewhat recent, development thank you for pointing this out.
Still, as you said, this is legally murky and I wouldn't be too surprised if this turns out to be overturned again by a higher court. Some German courts have a reputation for quickly and easily siding with copyright claimants, just to have it overturned later by a higher instance.
It's still really shitty that stuff like this keeps on happening and even when these claims turn out to be straight up scams (like that whole Redtube mess [0]) it has barely any real consequences in terms of laws being changed.
[0] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600869.2015.1012777?src=recsys https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600869.2015.1...
- Xylakant 9y agoThe EUGH decision is fairly recent and it’s about as far up as possible. So I wouldn’t hold my breath unless the EU doubles down on net neutrality.
- freeflight 9y agoThe EUGH link does not work, but the Vodafone case was a decision by a Munich court, which could still be overturned if somebody bothered going all the way up to the BVerfG.
- Xylakant 9y agoOdd, link works for me. In case you want to search for it, it’s lawsuit C‑314/12, the document identifier seems to be ECLI:EU:C:2014:192 Or you can follow the link in the first article to https://netzpolitik.org/2014/eugh-legt-zensur-grundlagen-netzsperren-bei-urheberrechtsverstoessen-zulaessig/ https://netzpolitik.org/2014/eugh-legt-zensur-grundlagen-net... which has a link to the court decision (grep for “Das Urteil”)
- freeflight 9y agoI'm getting a pretty weird CVRIA specific 404 (Page does not exist), in English and French when trying to access the link. Googling for "Telekabel Wien vs. Constantin Film" gives the same top result, but going through there also just gives me the same 404. Weird stuff going on at CVRIA?