3 ms·
If you are going to strike first, you really care about taking out as much counter strike possibilities. If 10% of your target's arsenal get's to retaliate beca
by rocqua 9y ago
If you are going to strike first, you really care about taking out as much counter strike possibilities. If 10% of your target's arsenal get's to retaliate because of missile defense systems, that is terrible for the first-striker.
Even if you don't want to strike first, there is still a great advantage to being able to do it better. Especially if your adversary knows about your capabilities but not your intentions. See for example north-Korea wanting nuclear weapons. Something similar might have played a role for Pakistan. Being a nuclear power gets you seats at certain tables. Being a more dangerous nuclear power gets you a better seat.
This strategy has the weak point of enticing preventative measures, but it is a strategy at least.