3 ms·
Sort of a sampling bias though. How many potentially qualified contributors simply do not contribute to the kernel because of Linus?
by stinkytaco 9y ago
Sort of a sampling bias though. How many potentially qualified contributors simply do not contribute to the kernel because of Linus?
- bluejekyll 9y agoThe process for submitting patches probably has an even larger deterrent effect than the personalities: http://nickdesaulniers.github.io/blog/2017/05/16/submitting-your-first-patch-to-the-linux-kernel-and-responding-to-feedback/ http://nickdesaulniers.github.io/blog/2017/05/16/submitting-... I think I saw a quote from Linus that this is a good filter for non-serious contributors, but it is an additional barrier for anyone who might want to get involved.
- setr 9y agoThe way I understand it, the kernel work is heavily subdivided into subcommanders and such; only a few people show code to linus directly. So I imagine its extremely unlikely that any early contributer could be turned off by a linus rant targeting them. They contributor loss would have to be based on the fact that the rants exist at all. My suspicion is that very few qualified contributors are scared off by the existence of Linus's rants. Maybe if it targetted them, repeatedly, but otherwise its difficult to imagine this is a significant source of loss.
- Retra 9y agoDoes it matter? If someone has some kernel development skill, they're probably writing kernel software. What does it matter if it isn't in Linux?