And it'd be my guess that they probably source some of their topics to research based on search results where users abandoned w/o clicking a result. Though I d

And it'd be my guess that they probably source some of their topics to research based on search results where users abandoned w/o clicking a result. Though I don't know that to be a fact as I don't work for them/speak with anyone from their team/etc., so I wouldn't try to leverage it in an article I'd write if I were a writer. Someone else mentioned that along with the true, false, undetermined (or is maybe distinct? I can't remember), and true/false flags, maybe they should just bite the bullet and add a "satire" flag. Essentially you're saying, yes, it is false, however it isn't meant to be taken seriously. Then Facebook can either do nothing or flag it as satire which I don't know the correct path here: for me, most of the fun of satire is not being presented "it is satire" up front and then picking it up pretty early on. Then again, not flagging it as satire would then leave it open for people to assume that it is legitimate as it wasn't flagged as fake. So unfortunate that fun can't be had anymore because some are generally intent on deceiving.