3 ms·
From the link: Quite frankly, even if the choice of C were to do *nothing* but keep the C++ programmers out, that in itself would be a huge reason to u
by metalliqaz 9y ago
From the link:
Quite frankly, even if the choice of C were to do *nothing* but keep the C++
programmers out, that in itself would be a huge reason to use C.
lol, thanks for that
- sifoo 9y agoPerl6 has Camelia (https://perl6.org/ https://perl6.org/) for much the same reasons. It's everywhere once you start looking for it. I've taught Ving Tsun Gongfu for about 25 years; used to have fancy uniforms, grades and walls covered with certifications; and put a lot of effort into entertaining people and stroking their egos. These days I'll rent whatever shabby room, show up in regular clothes and focus on teaching the real deal; the people who are in it for the right reasons don't care.
- renox 9y agoUnfortunately I think that this statement has some truth in it: I work in telecoms where we care about realtime: I was used to work in C but my latest project is in C++, I was curious about how C++ and realtime mix: the answer is quite poorly.. It's not that you can't do realtime in C++: it's that you have to fight against lots of C++ developers who want to apply the non-realtime C++ popular idioms. For example: using interface classes for mocking objects with googletest, the result: virtual methods everywhere..