3 ms·
The tone of article also implies (and I think is true) that the west views/viewed China from a position of moral authority. Like a parent being disappointed in
by dlwdlw 9y ago
The tone of article also implies (and I think is true) that the west views/viewed China from a position of moral authority. Like a parent being disappointed in a kid because it should know better. Culturally this leads to to the idea of "punishment" or reinforcing the parents idea of quality.
The issue is that countries see each other as equals and the punishment trick can't be easily used when nuclear weapons are involved.
Should we dehumanize those who dehumanize others? I don't think so. The US for a very long time has grown in a moral authority that is overreaching and over simplistic in it's definition of humanity. The only way to break cycles of hate is to show that there is a better way, not through the domination/punishment lens.
We're all products of rape and murder. To see rape and murder and not remember our past is to bask in cultural wealth wondering why everyone else is so poor.
- Certhas 9y agoPlus of course that the West in general and the US in particular are standing on shaky ground when making any moral argument. I believe that on the balance the systems as currently in place are relatively moral. Especially compared to historic precedent (also compare Russias war in Syria to the US wars, having to convince a domestic audience that you're the good guy puts real constraint on the use of military power). But the level of immoral behavior even just focusing on past WWII/Post-colonial times is still staggering and easy to point towards for others. "He may be a bastard, but he's our bastard."