3 ms·

I'm at work. Can someone at least tell me why I shouldn't click?

• Mc_Big_G 16y ago
  He reverses the negative image used in press releases of the new airport body scanners, which basically shows a naked woman.
• d4ft 16y ago
  backscatter nudity
• rabarber 16y ago
  because you should be working.
• torial 16y ago
  Basically it includes some screenshots of the supposed effectiveness of the Airport scanner... e.g. a nude woman, then has the images inverted. I didn't read the article too closely, I'm not sure that the author understands those images are from an image catalog that has nothing to do with the airport scanner, but have been misrepresented as being so. Can't provide citation, but saw that on an earlier article from HN about a month ago.
  • sp332 16y ago
    Reminds me of Hearst: "You furnish the images, I'll furnish the war!" He got images like this one of a woman being strip-searched NSFW http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Spaniards_search_women_1898.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Spaniards_search_women_189... which (he knew) was totally fabricated, and published them to rally pro-war sentiment.
• deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
• sp332 16y ago
  Text-only Google cache http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?strip=1&q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whattofix.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F08%2Fthe-99-rule-nsf.php http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?strip=1&q=c...
  • ciupicri 16y ago
    Or use lynx or disable images.