3 ms·
I actually found it difficult to pick something that better described this phenomena. These are obviously people whose compassion for animals is a function of
by avar 16y ago
I actually found it difficult to pick something that better described this phenomena.
These are obviously people whose compassion for animals is a function of their cuteness. I don't see them organizing lynch mobs for similar but much more inhumane acts against farm animals happening in their own communities. Would people care if this was a litter of pigs? Or a litter of rats?
And leaving aside this specific example, most people on this planet in rural communities don't have the economic means to employ a dedicated medical professional to put down their excess cats and dogs.
For those people drowning the animals is a perfectly legitimate option, it sure beats watching them starve to death.
Ignoring all of this and going straight to "oh those poor puppies, what a horrible person" as most people seem to respond is, I think, a privileged western viewpoint.
- mrcharles 16y agoIt is a false equivalence to compare companion animals to food or pests.
- loup-vaillant 16y agoI' not sure what you mean. Anyway, rats can make fine companions, and the taste of meat is a direct consequence of the treatment of beasts. So, I say we should care, even for purely selfish reasons.