3 ms·
>To-date there is no public research on fundamental aspect of Monero What about these papers? "An Empirical Analysis of Linkability in the Monero Blockchain"
by DINKDINK 9y ago
>To-date there is no public research on fundamental aspect of Monero
What about these papers?
"An Empirical Analysis of Linkability in the Monero Blockchain" - https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04299 https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04299
"A Traceability Analysis of Monero’s Blockchain" - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-66399-9_9 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-66399-9_...
https://youtu.be/qpn9ICem5wk?t=704 https://youtu.be/qpn9ICem5wk?t=704
- the_stc 9y agoFrom what I remember, those rely on some older aspects of Monero no longer present. But more importantly, they do not provide positive guidance on exactly how much mixing [churn] with what ring-sizes are needed to achieve a certain anonymity set size. Monero project itself has no statements on these key issues [except for a sentence in one of their updates stating that churning is not sufficient]. The research you linked does illustrate some problems. And Monero's reaction, to not include any disclaimers, to continue saying it is private and untraceable... misleads users.
- DINKDINK 9y ago>rely on some older aspects of Monero no longer present My understanding is Monero recognized these weakness and patched to avoid them.