3 ms·
Adjusting that to match what I know: If people have never met someone who has LOST A CHILD TO MURDER, then to them it's an abstract concept. They can't imagine
by tropo 9y ago
Adjusting that to match what I know:
If people have never met someone who has LOST A CHILD TO MURDER, then to them it's an abstract concept. They can't imagine the pain or suffering. I've met a couple of people who've LOST THEIR CHILD.
That daughter can never be replaced. The father just about bankrupted himself traveling 1500 miles each way to be at the court for every hearing. It's been over a dozen years, largely fighting over the issue of being fit for trial. There has been a conviction-turned-mistrial related to the killer having a disagreement with his court-assigned lawyer over his plea. The killer refuses to take medication and may be of questionable sanity. He is likely to go free soon. The father still shows up to court, older and poorer every time, dedicating his life to keeping the killer locked up by keeping the prosecutor and judge aware that somebody cares.
You're lacking in compassion for people like that broken forever-grieving father when you argue for less punishment.
- romwell 9y agoOne is not lacking in compassion for the father by also wishing to improve the situation of the murderer. Compassion is not a zero-sum game.