3 ms·
We've just moved from stack ranking to a coaching orientated "flag if there is an issue" system. Thank the gods. So much time is wasted in performance managemen
by shamzamblamb 9y ago
We've just moved from stack ranking to a coaching orientated "flag if there is an issue" system. Thank the gods. So much time is wasted in performance management; what counts is that people who are not contributing can be coached into success; or removed if they are really not suitable to the team (very rare - and the fault of the manager - me - who accepted them). Promotion is done competitively and on the basis of achievements, so high achievers have a chance to differentiate. What I think is : all employees must have goals for their year; those goals should lead to growth and development - project contribution is table stakes... just do your job! Issues that get in the way need to go to the goal register.
Most (95%) people want to do their fair share and be good at their job. Some years they do a little worse because of health or family issues, some years they hit it out of the park. The 5% who don't want to do this are always a problem and need to be catered for separately. High performers can get promotions. Appraisals are to determine these two things and share information.
- inevitable2 9y ago"...all employees must have goals for their year..." In all seriousness, this type of appraisal process always confused me. What are some examples of measurable goals that a rank-and-file "Member of The Technical Staff" can come up with on their own, seeing as they likely don't have much choice re the projects they work on, the teams they are in, etc.?