3 ms·
That's fine, you just route to /dev/null everything that goes to the anonymised address; the email headers either won't be re-written or will be re-written a la
by tankenmate 9y ago
That's fine, you just route to /dev/null everything that goes to the anonymised address; the email headers either won't be re-written or will be re-written a la RFC 5321. Either way you'll be able to easily identify emails sent to the anon email address and dump them on the floor.
- bringtheaction 9y agoThen you might as well just use an email address that you don’t use, and there is no difference between doing that in the future and doing so today.
- cptskippy 9y agoAs well as any legitimate emails coming to you regarding your domain.
- zaarn 9y agoI don't think I ever received legitimate forms of coherent communication over my WHOIS emails.
- icebraining 9y agoI have - the WHOIS verification email! https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en#whois-accuracy https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-20...
- alsetmusic 9y ago> I don't think I ever received legitimate forms of coherent communication over my WHOIS emails. Given that blog authors increasingly rely on Twitter for feedback (which I don’t use), I occasionally check whois to send notifications about dead links, rendering issues, etc.