3 ms·
Skype for Linux was OK for years. It worked reasonably well till recently on my old laptop. Recently (may be a few months ago), MS upgraded Skype to make it "b
by hal9000xp 9y ago
Skype for Linux was OK for years. It worked reasonably well till recently on my old laptop.
Recently (may be a few months ago), MS upgraded Skype to make it "better". I must upgrade Skype since old client stopped working as they break backward compatibility.
After upgrade, new Skype started using a lot of CPU, memory and disk IO. To the point that I can't work in browser while running Skype. If you launch Skype, it started very slowly. Since I still have HDD, I can hear scream of my HDD during heavy Skype launch. New Skype is so bloated and slow that, I had to remove it because I didn't want to torture myself and my poor old laptop.
You may say that I have to upgrade hardware but I find this argument quite annoying because Skype is just a messenger and video/voice call app. This functionality worked perfectly well for years and now just because of Skype developers, I have to upgrade my hardware in order to use the same app with the same functionality.
In the bigger picture, I see that modern apps have a tendency to be fat and bloated. And it looks like many developers are totally OK with that.
I would recommend Skype developers read this:
https://suckless.org/philosophy https://suckless.org/philosophy