You are obviously right. But it has to be mentioned that some times courts rule in ways different than what is fair. In law some times you have two things whic

You are obviously right. But it has to be mentioned that some times courts rule in ways different than what is fair. In law some times you have two things which you want to hold true simultaneously, something along the lines of 1) people have the right to move freely between member states, and 2) people should have the right to expectation that their lives won't be derailed by high-level disagreements between states. Some times these truths (which are most often aligned), contradict each other in some edge case scenario (like brexit). Solving this usually means that a court will decide that one truth is more important than the other, and predicting these outcomes seems almost impossible to me as a non-law person. So while I completely agree with you, to me it's far from obvious what the outcome here will be.