From a Bayesian point of view randomness is always merely a lack of knowledge. In that sense there's no problem with viewing the outcome of a deterministic proc

From a Bayesian point of view randomness is always merely a lack of knowledge. In that sense there's no problem with viewing the outcome of a deterministic process as something random. Viewed from that perspective what this p-value means is that merely knowing the proportion of articles that gets marked for deletion is already enough to conclude that it is likely (or at least not impossible) for a group of 21 articles to have at least 2 articles marked for deletion. In that sense the knowledge that of the 21 articles written on women, 2 were marked for deletion doesn't really tell us something that we didn't already know. Of course that doesn't mean we've exhausted all available knowledge, but you're going to have to look further than just how many articles get deleted.