4 ms·
> Even their cross platform support is the best. Even if it's based on Electron, their Linux desktop client at least exists and this is reason enough for me to
by foepys 9y ago
> Even their cross platform support is the best.
Even if it's based on Electron, their Linux desktop client at least exists and this is reason enough for me to keep being a subscriber. The web player is working but is missing features and has some major bugs (e.g., I cannot "dislike" a song on a playlist). My one wish would be for it to get on the same level of playlist management that Amarok, Foobar2000 and similar music players were on like 15 years ago...
Amazon Music's desktop client, despite also being Electron-based, is only available on Windows and Mac and its usability is so bad, I cannot even describe it. There is a reason why Amazon Music is a lot cheaper: it's worse in every metric beside costs that I were evaluating.
- arghwhat 9y ago> despite also being Electron-based, is only available on Windows and Mac Electron does not make cross-compilation easy. It's about as cumbersome as building any other C++ project for multiple platforms.
- diggan 9y agoSince when is Spotify a Electron application? I recall it having the UI made with JavaScript, HTML and CSS but all the rest is handled with C++. Think they were using Chromium Embedded Framework.
- foepys 9y agoOh, I were under the impression that it's electron. Even better then.
- kristianc 9y agoAs far as I know the Ubuntu port was made by Canonical and is a Snap package, not an Electron app.