3 ms·
If saving the animals = more profit, then more animals will be saved. That's the argument, at least, not saying it's feasible.
by toasterlovin 9y ago
If saving the animals = more profit, then more animals will be saved. That's the argument, at least, not saying it's feasible.
- Can_Not 9y agoAll you did was repeat the argument without adding any plausible explanation.
- toasterlovin 9y agoIs it really necessary to explain that people desire to enrich themselves, therefore they seek profit, therefore they will do things which resulted in profit?
- Can_Not 9y agoIt necessary to explain when you magically hand-wave in that it's going to benefit the environment and natural animal populations when all evidence and logic indicates the opposite.