3 ms·

You're going to leave a lot of people behind with this. Which is good or bad depending on your worldview. Purging people with bad genes by profiling them could

• matte_black 9y ago
  There is no “purge”. People with bad genes can still have children, and will. However, over time as societal awareness grows it becomes harder. Two people with bad genes might mate less commonly, however a person with great genes may settle for someone with bad genes, producing OK children. To me this is good, and is basically what happens now only a lot less efficiently. Genocide is completely unnecessary, and is basically for governments with bad agendas and impatience to wait for genes to improve naturally.
  • zeth___ 9y ago
    >impatience to wait for genes to improve naturally. Improve relative to what? The ideal human in 12,000 BC was a furry mess who would hunt mastodons with their nails. The ideal human in 4,000 BC was a farmer that could bend double in their waist to plant and pick produce from the ground. The ideal human in 1,200 AD was a bow legged hugely muscular chest that would stand being on a wet saddle for a week at a time.
    • arethuza 9y ago
      And in some places the ideal human in the 20th century was someone whose ancestor "was a bow legged hugely muscular chest that would stand being on a wet saddle for a week at a time" 800 years ago....