3 ms·
It still baffles me that the official response from the IOTA foundation is that the vulnerability was inserted intentionally as copy-protection. And even more
by ola 9y ago
It still baffles me that the official response from the IOTA foundation is that the vulnerability was inserted intentionally as copy-protection.
And even more baffling that their flagship partner Bosch does not seem to have problem with this practice.
- once_inc 9y agoI doubt that any of the decision makers at Bosch have enough theoretical knowledge to be able to form any sort of opinion about it.
- user5454 9y agoWell, as IOTA targets embedded devices (I guess the reason Bosch is interested) they should have enough knowledge to form an opinion about transaction sizes: "transactions in IOTA are 10KB (in contrast, Bitcoin transactions are on average 600B)" [1] https://medium.com/@neha/cryptographic-vulnerabilities-in-iota-9a6a9ddc4367 https://medium.com/@neha/cryptographic-vulnerabilities-in-io...