4 ms·
For anyone interested about the attitude of various Soviet-sympathetic people in the West during the 20th century, I'd recommend reading Scott Alexander's book
by DanAndersen 9y ago
For anyone interested about the attitude of various Soviet-sympathetic people in the West during the 20th century, I'd recommend reading Scott Alexander's book review of "Chronicles of Wasted Time" [0]. I admit I haven't read the book itself but the review seems to do a good job summing things up.
Basically it's the autobiography of Malcolm Muggeridge, who grew up in a socialist background, becomes a journalist and goes over to Stalin's USSR to report on the amazing new progress being made, only to realize just how false all the reports are -- and what's more, how unwilling his target audience would be to hear it:
[quotes from the review]
>although it is clear to him that the Soviet economy is struggling, every dispatch they are given to send home declares that things are better than ever, that the Workers’ Paradise is even more paradisiacal than previously believed, that the evidence is in and Stalinism is the winner. It doesn’t matter what he makes of this, because anything he writes which deviates from the script is rejected by the censors, who ban him from sending it home. He is reduced to sending secret messages at the bottoms of people’s suitcases, only to find to his horror that even when they successfully reach the Guardian offices back in Britain, his bosses have no interest in publishing them because they offend the prejudices of its progressive readership.
[...]
>His final break with the rest of the enlightened progressive world comes when he decides to do something that perhaps no other journalist in the entire Soviet Union had dared – to go off the reservation, so to speak, leave Moscow undercover, and see if he can actually get into the regions where rumors say some kind of famine might be happening. The plan goes without a hitch, he passes himself off as a generic middle-class Soviet, and he ends up in Ukraine right in the middle of Stalin’s Great Famine. He describes the scene – famished skeletons begging for crumbs, secret police herding entire towns into railway cars never to be seen again. At great risk to himself, he smuggles notes about the genocide out of the country, only to be met – once again – with total lack of interest. Guardian readers don’t look at the newspapers to hear bad things about the Soviet Union! Guardian readers want to hear about how the Glorious Future is already on its way! He is quickly sidelined in favor of the true stars of Soviet journalism, people like Walter Duranty, the New York Times‘s Russia correspondent, who wrote story after story about how prosperous and happy and well-fed the Soviets were under Stalin, and who later won the Pulitzer Prize for his troubles.
[0] http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/08/11/book-review-chronicles-of-wasted-time/ http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/08/11/book-review-chronicles-...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- reacweb 9y agoYes. URSS has been very effective in the long-term manipulation of opinions and history. I am french. IMHO, May 1968 events were the consequences of this manipulated opinions. The "anti-capitalist" ideology was very present in governments between 1981 and 2007 (maybe 2017). The "anti-religious" ideology is still present.