3 ms·
I think we need to take it seriously that there are systemic problems here. We are allowing a system to develop with a few big winners, a lot of losers and litt
by contingencies 9y ago
I think we need to take it seriously that there are systemic problems here. We are allowing a system to develop with a few big winners, a lot of losers and little or no middle class.
I believe Marxists see this as the inevitable endgame of capitalism... by rewarding hoarded capital, there is no possible conclusion except the centralization of wealth to enormous levels of disparity.
Even for those of us who travel across boundaries, in some parts of the world I personally feel ridiculously wealthy (which objectively I am) whereas I can't afford to raise my kids in the manner and environment in which I myself was raised (which was not considered particularly wealthy at the time).
Politics seems to have failed us on most fronts, and the big problems are really international and therefore beyond the scope and reign of political animals, even naively assuming they cannot be bought out or sidestepped. Perhaps then, fundamentally as individuals we can only analyze the net effects of our actions and try to contribute to positive change instead of perpetuating a self-serving culture.
More snarkily, "Oh, you can't make a good living producing content on the internet with $1000s of dollars of e-toys?" ... this is perhaps something of a first world problem, where others are still down the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy.
- DoreenMichele 9y agoYes, it's a first world problem. That doesn't mean it isn't a very serious problem. We are seeing stresses that have millionaires scared of where this goes. If the first world can't figure out how to turn this wealth of tech and knowledge into widespread middle class comforts and devolves into revolution and can therefore no longer send aid to developing nations with "real problems" I think things will get really ugly globally.
- themaninthedark 9y agoAt some point rather recently we made the decision to get rid of all the icky blue collar jobs and replace them with service economy job. The people who protested this change were branded as backwards hicks and their concerns were hand waved away along with promises of retraining. The gig economy is just more of the same but we get told that wages are rising in other countries so we should be happy, as we subsidize some startup with our cars or our houses. But hey, we are getting rid of the 9 to 5 right?