3 ms·
The biggest problem isn't really lowering overall consumption but lowering peak consumption. There's typically enough capacity during the night, but not on summ
by calebegg 9y ago
The biggest problem isn't really lowering overall consumption but lowering peak consumption. There's typically enough capacity during the night, but not on summer afternoons. Some power companies will pay you to install a device to cut off your AC for ~15 minutes during peaks (controlled by them, of course).
Nest has a program that gives the power company a small amount of control, in return for which you get a bill credit (and a free or discounted Nest).
https://nest.com/energy-partners/#rush-hour https://nest.com/energy-partners/#rush-hour
And, of course, there's peak pricing, which is more what you're suggesting. But power companies are a regulated monopoly, so there are typically restrictions on how much they can increase the price. If they can lower peak consumption within their regulated prices, they can defer on infrastructure investments and thus save money.
- gwbas1c 9y agoThat's the biggest load of bull I've heard. (From the power companies.) They need to invest in batteries and diesels, not tell us what to do. Diesels are the industry term for small generators that can start within a few seconds during high load. They can run on diesel or natural gas.
- aianus 9y agoPaying to turn people's A/C off for 15 min is more efficient than having a bank of generators used for 15 min, 2 days a year. If it works, it's much preferable.