I've never understood this argument. Humans cause accidents in certain cases, mostly by carelessness. AI causes accidents in certain cases, mostly by its stup

I've never understood this argument. Humans cause accidents in certain cases, mostly by carelessness. AI causes accidents in certain cases, mostly by its stupidity. These are different cases they fail in. You shouldn't be comparing a driverless AI to a unaided human, but a human aided by the driverless AI acting as a driving aid (you know, like automatic emergency breaking). this way you get the best of both worlds, the attentiveness of the AI to dumb things, and the smartness of humans. I am sure a driverless AI if good enough won't beat a human aided by the same driverless AI acting as a "autopilot/supervisor"