4 ms·
I think the intention was to say self-driving vehicles with no passengers, though I could be wrong. The reason being that a car driving itself around with no o
by xigency 9y ago
I think the intention was to say self-driving vehicles with no passengers, though I could be wrong.
The reason being that a car driving itself around with no one in it is essentially wasting resources and spewing out emissions. The example comes up often in what-ifs about self-driving cars.
- joshstrange 9y agoAhh, well that I can get behind IF they are in congested traffic because one of the big advantages of driverless cars is mine can drop me off at work then go park in a charging garage across town. I wouldn't want to be taxed for my car driving on a wide-open road to a more efficient location.
- chillacy 9y agoYou'll still pay for it indirectly through the cost of gas and putting miles on your car though. Which is the ideal way to "tax" usage anyways.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]