Let's just assume that "disincentivize thinking" is a euphemism for "prosecute thoughcrime" and put it to the test. Stop right there. I never meant that all di

Let's just assume that "disincentivize thinking" is a euphemism for "prosecute thoughcrime" and put it to the test. Stop right there. I never meant that all disincentivize suck-it-up thinking was prosecute thoughcrime, so your example doesn't disprove anything here. It's a useful example, however. But a lot of "disincentivize suck-it-up thinking" is actually just the suppression of dissent, because someone in power thinks it is "wrongthink." You can even view the anecdote above as a "discussion," where improved build code is part of the interchange.