4 ms·
The breach data isn't updated that often. It was 6 months between v1 and v2, so a long cache is totally fine. And then invalidate the cache if there is an updat
by Bedon292 9y ago
The breach data isn't updated that often. It was 6 months between v1 and v2, so a long cache is totally fine. And then invalidate the cache if there is an update.
- skrebbel 9y agoThat.. sort of supports my argument :-) He could cache it indefinitely instead of 30 days if he's going to invalidate the cache anyway.
- Bedon292 9y agoI do appear to have misinterpreted what your point was. Sorry about that. Although I assume the idea was limiting how much is cached at any point on their part. Not sure it really matters though its not that much data.