5 ms·
For one, the human has a brain and human sensors are less easily fooled despite being able to "see" less. LIDAR technology combined with ML is so poor that it
by mmmBacon 9y ago
For one, the human has a brain and human sensors are less easily fooled despite being able to "see" less. LIDAR technology combined with ML is so poor that it can easily be fooled by a stop sign with a sticker on it.
Source:[https://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/sensors/slight-street-sign-modifications-can-fool-machine-learning-algorithms https://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/sen...]
A human has context where a machine does not. A human automatically knows that a ball being thrown in a yard can end up in the street.
A learner's permit also requires that a licensed driver be present. So there's a built in redundancy for decision making.
Machine learning or not, computers are simply profoundly stupid.
I'm not against autonomous vehicles but I'm fairly skeptical about them. They've improved a lot in a basic way but they don't handle corner cases very well. Unfortunately, driving involves a lot of corner cases due to the complexity of the environment.
- abenga 9y agoAnd how many pedestrians/passengers were killed by autonomous cars during this entire testing period? How many by human drivers? How can you trust human minds so much after the answers to those questions?