4 ms·
I also recommend Wordpress with HardyPress. You can use Wordpress to create content more elegantly than with static plain files, and you can use HardyPress to m
by csbartus 9y ago
I also recommend Wordpress with HardyPress. You can use Wordpress to create content more elegantly than with static plain files, and you can use HardyPress to make the result a fully static site.
I've been running my own blogs / portfolio in the last decade on static sites, from now now I'm using this new combo. Why? With the advent of the headless CMS scene static site generators just lost their unique advantage to spitting out HTML files. And meantime they didn't advance at all on the content creation side.
Creating, managing and distributing content with a CMS is far easier than with a static site generator. And when the final output is the same the choice is obvious.
Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with HardyPress nor Wordpress, however I do create themes for Wordpress.
Notes: In my profile the first link is a statically generated site, as well as the others in the About section. The second link is a Wordpress+HardyPress combo and you can check it live the amazing speed it offers.
- artemis73 9y agoWill check out HardyPress. Thanks! It might make things easier if I end up with WordPress. Wasn't aware of it :)