3 ms·
That's why a lot of people at the top avoid email completely, not only is it an evidence trail it can be open to interpretation later on. Remember reading that
by gagabity 9y ago
That's why a lot of people at the top avoid email completely, not only is it an evidence trail it can be open to interpretation later on.
Remember reading that bank CEOs use email very sparingly, all the details are worked out in person, Trump also doesn't use email.
- exelius 9y agoYup; pretty much any top executive at a public company actually. E-mail is only used in those instances where you want a paper trail. With the personal liability placed on executives under SOX, many simply do it out of personal protection. One of the unintended consequences of SOX that has ironically lead to less transparency.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- anonbanker 9y agoKeep your email entirely in a jurisdiction that doesn't cooperate with your country's law enforcement. I can think of three off the top of my head. Sensitive topics are only discussed with someone located in the same domain as you. Quite easy to avoid criminal charges when your email is out of reach of a subpoena.
- zaphar 9y agoIn practical terms it is impossible to keep your email in a particular jurisdiction. The proposal gives you no way to ensure it. And any steps you might take only serve to reduce everything that makes email useful. You are safer just not using it and will probably have a better user experience as well.